Loon-A-Tic Fundamentalist On The Role Of Women genre: Hip-Gnosis & Video-Philes

Anyone with doubts as to the insane interpretations gleaned from the Bible need only watch this video. The goon in the video advises the viewers who are not "real" Christians to move on as they won't understand the message or the instructions.

The speaker insinuates that he is offering his insights as fair warning to those women who may not understand the "rules". The basic message is that the role of women is to serve men. He points out that a woman's body is made for her husbands use and pleasure and to bear and care for his children.

After taking a look at this idiot, the first thought that went through my mind was that the only way he would ever have a wife is by virtue of imposing his absurd ideology. I feel sorry for any woman that submits to a man of this ilk. Those in need of convincing that religion is used as a means to power would do well to see this creep in action.

H/T to Christian Pwnage 101

Tagged as: Dogma, Fanaticism, Fundamentalism, God Tube, Misogyny, Religion, Womens Rights

Daniel DiRito | September 4, 2007 | 8:20 AM
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

1 On September 4, 2007 at 12:44 PM, Dr X wrote —

I can't resist a little commentary on the content:

He said:

"If you walk after the flesh your name will be stricken from the book of life."

Then he said:

"A woman's body, her sexual organs, her breasts were made for her husband's use and pleasure." Sounds like this fleshy guy is urging men to "walk after the flesh." Does he want straight men stricken from the book of life and thrown into the lake of fire?

Incidentally, the Genesis stories don't say that God made Eve's body for the use and pleasure of her husband, it says that he made woman because it is not good for man to be alone.

And, he didn't say they were married ("husband" is not a term mentioned), nor did he mention anything about the two having sex when he made them. They didn't have kids until after being cast out of the Garden. He made no mention that one or the other had exclusive rights to sexual pleasure.

And since he's so into the O.T., you think this windbag obeys all the requirements of Leviticus. I don't know, that shirt sure looks like a cheap synthetic and I'd be willing to bet he doesn't mind eating a little ham now and then.

2 On September 4, 2007 at 12:59 PM, Ben in oakland wrote —

So scary as to be almost a parody of itself.

Dr. X--you would do well to remember and paraphrase Humpty Dumpty: "(My texts of recevied wisdom) mean exactly what I say they mean. nothing more and nothing less."

Thought Theater at Blogged

Post a comment


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry


© Copyright 2024

Casting

Read about the Director and Cast

Send us an email

Select a theme:

Critic's Corner

 Subscribe in a reader

Encores

http://DeeperLeft.com

Powered by:
Movable Type 4.2-en

© Copyright 2024

site by Eagle River Partners & Carlson Design